Thursday, December 9, 2010

A Toast to Five More Years of Howard

A few weeks ago for my Psychology of Personality class I had to write a paper assessing aspects of a celebrity's personality using different personality theories that we talked about. At first I thought I was going to write about Sarah Palin. I quickly realized that politicians are completely fake all the time, and assessing her actual personality would be nearly impossible. Then to my delight, my loving boyfriend Robby came up with a great idea and suggested I write about his radio hero, Howard Stern. What a perfect candidate. There is seriously no one more real or with more personality than this man.

With Stern's exciting announcement to extend his contract with Sirius for five more years, and because I got my graded paper back last night with an A, I thought it would be fitting to post it here. So if you are interested in reading a somewhat lengthy personality assessment of Howard Stern, read on.


Howard Stern: The King of All Neuroticism

Howard Stern, the outspoken and self-proclaimed “King of All Media” has been one of the most distinct and popular radio personalities for over the last 20 years. Known for his extremely honest yet controversial topics, Stern has made himself the highest paid disc jockey in history. His climb to the top was achieved by a combination of news-making antics, “inappropriate” guests and conversation topics (being fined by the FCC more than anyone else in history), and a talent for interviewing and telling great stories. Even with all of these unique aspects that are the Howard Stern Show, the one thing that really brings it all together and keeps him at the top, his loyal listeners glued to their Sirius radios day after day always wanting more: his personality. Unlike most other people in the lime-light who make their living pretending to be someone they are not, Stern uses his very real and very intense personality to his advantage. Attending counseling five days a week, Stern has a lot going on inside his brain. So what does it take to make a Howard Stern? It's slightly more complicated than taking a teaspoon of determination, a dash of narcissism, a sprinkle of genius and a cup full of wit, mixed in a bowl of “I don't give a damn.” Stern's unique personality can be explained using several different psychological theories including the Trait Approach, Social Learning Theory, and the Psychoanalytic Approach.

One of the most common ways we describe people's personalities in everyday life is by listing their obvious characteristics. A major theory in the study of personality that does this is the trait approach. Based largely on empirical research that mostly uses correlational designs, the trait approach focuses entirely on categories of individual differences in a single person and how the degrees of those traits compare to other people (Funder, 2010). In short, it attempts to predict and understand behavior across time and in different situations (Funder, 2010). More specifically, within this approach are four different methods of evaluation: the single-trait approach (which focuses on single personality traits that have been deemed important over the years and asks what do people with these certain personality traits do?), the many-trait approach (which focuses more on important behaviors by using lists of traits intended to correlate with specific behaviors), the essential-trait approach (which attempts to narrow down personality traits to the few most essential ones, including “The Big Five,”) and the typological approach (which tries to identify “types” of people by categorizing patterns of traits) (Funder, 2010). A logical approach to explaining Howard Stern's personality is the third method--the essential-trait approach.

Although Stern has been described as narcissistic, socially bold, anxious, dominant and blunt, yet determined, loyal, and honest, just to name a few--the characteristics that really stand out in his personality can be best shown using “The Big Five.” These personality traits are comprised along different spectrums of openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. They have shown to be universally important in many different cultures according to the Lexical Hypothesis, which argues that important aspects of life will be labeled with words, and if something is indeed important and universal there will be many words for it in all languages. They are currently the most widely accepted grouping of essential traits (Funder, 2010).

Everyone has each of the Big Five traits to a certain extent. Scoring high on the openness scale means that the person has wide interests is imaginative, intelligent, insightful, curious, and sophisticated while scoring low on openness means that the person has generally narrow interests is simple, shallow and unintelligent. Someone who is high in conscientiousness tends to be very organized, thorough, efficient and responsible, while on the low end people tend to be careless, disorderly, and irresponsible. Those who score high in extraversion are likely to be talkative, assertive, energetic, outgoing, dominant and enthusiastic, while those who score low (introverted) tend to be quiet, reserved, shy, silent and withdrawn. Agreeableness affiliates are generally sympathetic, kind, appreciative, affectionate, softhearted and warm, while their low scoring counterparts tend to be fault-finding, cold, unfriendly, quarrelsome and hard-hearted. The last of the traits, neuroticism, includes those who are very tense, anxious, nervous, moody, worrying and touchy, in contrast with those who are stable, calm, contented and unemotional (Funder, 2010). While most people hang around the middle of the spectrum on each of the Big Five traits, few score very extreme in either direction. Howard Stern on the other hand rates very high or low in several traits including neuroticism, conscientiousness and agreeableness.

After listening to just one “Howard Stern Show” it becomes obvious just how much neuroticism Stern displays. He is constantly upset with at least one person or situation. He has a terrible time dealing with criticism and has very strong reactions to anyone who disagrees with him. He gets anxious in many situations (especially social ones), and is always worried and stressing out about something. His neurotic tendencies have led to several mental disorders including hypochondria and obsessive compulsive disorder, as is common among people of his nature. Something that makes his neuroticism worse and even leads over into his high conscientiousness score are his tendencies toward perfectionism, especially in his work.

“When you hire me, you hire a nut who is going to work 24 hours a day for you and never, ever burn his audience” (http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/h/howard_stern. html). Stern is a textbook workaholic, who takes what he does very seriously and does his best to succeed. This is typical of people who are perfectionists (Clark, Lelchook & Taylor, 2010). Self-oriented perfectionism and conscientiousness are highly correlated with each other, while socially prescribed perfectionism is highly correlated with neuroticism (Stoeber, Otto & Dalbert, 2009). This reflects not only in Stern's perfect attendance and punctuality (he hasn't missed or been late to a show in years), but also his need for order. If something is cluttered in the studio, if someone makes a mess and doesn't clean it up, or if one of his employees does something they are not supposed to, Stern responds rapidly and rigidly. Unfortunately, this type of unfriendly behavior exhibits his lack of agreeableness.

Although people who know Stern do say that overall they like him, he is far from being warm and inviting. His is not empathetic, far from optimistic, and definitely puts his own self-interests in front of getting along with others. He is unlikely to go out of his way to help others (his refusal to write anymore forwards for people's books is one example of this), and is very competitive. He likes to point out faults in other people, and is very quick to think people are trying to take advantage of him. “I seem to be some sort of lightning rod. I just really irritate people, you know? I really do” (http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/h/howard_stern. html). And it is true, he really does have a tendency to get under people's skin, but that (along with his amazing wit) is exactly what makes him so appealing.

The next useful theory in assessing Stern's personality is Dollard and Miller’s social learning theory. This learning theory focuses on the concept of the habit hierarchy. The behavior that is most likely to be performed at a given time is the behavior that is placed at the top of that individual's habit hierarchy, while the least likely behavior is placed at the bottom (Funder, 2010). According to Dollard and Miller (1941), humans have two distinct psychological drives. The first, the primary drive, include the need for food, water, physical comfort, sexual gratification etc., which everyone is born with, while secondary drives include positive drives for love, prestige, money and power etc., which everyone learns during socialization. They argue that in order for a behavior to happen, the reward that comes from it must satisfy one of these needs (Funder, 2010).

In the case of Howard Stern, love, prestige, money and power are all needs that are satisfied with his work, so it makes perfect sense that he would continue to behave in ways that allow those needs to be met. His controversial way of doing things gets ratings. Those ratings in return satisfy all his secondary needs, so in order to keep those positive feelings high he needs to keep working hard to make sure he is a success. Since his neurotic behavior only adds to his ratings, he is likely to keep exhibiting it over time.

If needs are not being met and are being blocked in some way, according to Dollard and Miller's frustration-aggression hypothesis that is where anger comes in (Funder, 2010). So for example, when Benji (one of Stern's writers) comes into the studio a few minutes late in the morning, disrupting the show, Stern expresses his anger and threatens to fire him. Why? Because Benji's disruptive behavior poses a threat to the success of the show. Because the Howard Stern Show is indeed Stern’s livelihood, a threat to the actualization of it is met with strong negative feelings.

The last personality theory that can be used to describe Stern's personality is the psychoanalytic theory, but more specifically neo-Freudian, Karen Horney's theory of neurosis. Horney argued that adult behavior is often based on efforts to overcome the basic anxiety acquired in childhood. This basic anxiety develops when a child feels “helpless...in a hostile world,” when their upbringing is overly harsh, emotionally barren, or stiflingly controlled (Hjertaas, 2009). Attempts to avoid this anxiety (either consciously or subconsciously) can cause what she called “neurotic needs” which constitute of what people think they need in life in order to compensate for their anxiety and then succeed (Funder, 2010). Horney maintained that there are three different types of people with neurotic needs: compliant types, hostile types and detached types. Compliant types generally move towards people and seek affection and approval. Hostile types move against people and have a need for power, social recognition and prestige, as well as personal admiration. The detached types tend to move away from people and have a need for personal achievement, independence, and perfection. Obviously Stern falls under the hostile type category, because he displays all of its necessities including the need to be in control and have power over others, while at the same time seeks their praise and recognition. If he isn't the center of attention he becomes very agitated and insecure of his role in society.

Stern has an uncanny need for power. He has to always dominate situations, and will never let someone walk all over him. This may stem from his experiences as a child growing up in a rough African-American neighborhood, where he was often bullied. Furthermore, Stern exploits others by using their talents to promote his own (by hiring writers, comedians and other people who make his show run smoothly), and craves social recognition and prestige. He needs people to admire him and confirm his excellence, and thinks very highly of himself (the term “King of All Media” did not come out of thin air), correspondingly scoring high on the narcissism scale. These needs of praise are an attempt to compensate for lack of praise and attention he received when he was younger.

Stern also shows some characteristics of the detached type but to a lesser extent. He focuses a great deal on personal achievement, definitely fears failure, and as mentioned in the other theories, he strives to be perfect. Stern is not self-sufficient however; as he is completely dependent on other people to do most things for him (including cleaning, cooking, shopping, etc.) both at home and at work.

Although Stern comes off as an extremely difficult and negative kind of guy, he is all-in-all just a man who is trying to do his best with what he has. Because it is so hard to define someone's “personality,” it is important to utilize many of these different psychological theories when analyzing the different characteristics and levels of people. By doing this, we can begin to understand a much more broad concept of what kind of person someone truly is, and begin to gain insight on what it is like to be in someone else's shoes. With a character like Howard Stern, it is very interesting to see the underlying reasons behind why might behave the way he does, and it will be interesting to see where he ends up next. Baba Booey! Baba Booey!

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Fee Hike Protesters, Get Your Shit Straight

Unless you’ve been living under a rock for the last few months, most of you know that there has been a lot of drama centered around the recent decision of the UC Board of Regents to increase tuition fees by over 30% in the next year. At UCLA where the November 19th meeting was held, students gathered to protest the largely unpopular vote. Fifteen people were arrested or cited total there, a rather small number compared to the slew of over 50 students arrested on campus at my own school, UC Davis.

During a two day period, protesters marched around campus holding signs, chanting their disgust with the fee hike. They settled in Mrak Hall (the main administration building) where they succesfully managed to set up a meeting with the Student Affairs vice chancellor and the campus budget director to discuss the issues. When 5 o’clock rolled around it was announced that the building was closed for the night and everyone would have to leave. The majority did, however more than a few pesky students decided to give the officers problems. In all, 52 students were arrested for tresspassing and taken to the Yolo County Jail for the night.

Many people seem to believe that these protests are a good thing. People are excited about getting involved and standing up for what they believe in, sticking it to the man. That’s all fine and dandy to me in theory; but not when you are protesting against the wrong people, causing even more problems that our schools should not have to deal with right now.

The fee increases are NECESSARY. For over two years the UC system has been receiving millions of dollars in cuts forcing them to lay off faculty, cut classes, enroll less students, and impose other difficult measures. If schools aren’t being properly funded it is impossible go on as usual. If something isn’t done soon about the poor state of funding for colleges, schools are going to fall into a hole so deep that they will never be able to climb out. The standard of education at a university level will fall. It will no longer mean the same thing to have a degree from UC Berkeley because they will have had to cut so many programs, stop spending money on research and get rid of so much faculty that the state of the art education UCs once had will be no more.

Students who are upset apparently don’t understand what is at stake. These students also are forgetting or unaware that the UCs have what’s called the “Blue and Gold” program that will cover all fees for those whose families make less than 70K a year. That means that over 1/3 of students are eligible for full financial aid: a large number of the people protesting. Not only that but the entire financial aid system is being expanded to help even more people than ever. Those students who don’t qualify have no right to complain whatsoever because that means they can sure as hell afford an extra couple thousand dollars for their education.

We are in a recession. The piss-poor management at the state and federal levels are failing our country and it is affecting everyone. Universities now receive half of the support they recieved in 1991, and unless we address this huge problem in academic funding it will only get worse. Because schools aren’t getting enough help from the state they need to take whatever means necessary to keep universities at a high level of functioning; if that means increasing tuition then we need to bite the bullet and handle it in a productive way.

In order to start fixing the damage, we all need to start getting involved at the ballots. Start by writing letters to your representatives telling them your disgust and how you want it fixed. Research candidates for elected positions and vote for the ones who care about education and are willing to make it a priority. It is important for students to be politically active, but more importantly to be politically mature. Stop making the problems worse and start actually taking control of your education.

Protesting universities themselves or the people on the Board of Regents, who have done a good job to date, is not going to help anything but rather make everyone’s jobs more difficult when they are already facing challenges. The Regents don’t want to impose a fee increase. They aren’t going to benefit personally from it. They understand what will happen if we don’t get that extra money and they are responding accordingly.

So to all the protestors out there, PLEASE stop wasting your time getting mad at the people on the university level and start directing your outrage to the state and federal governments who are the ones fucking everything up in the first place.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

The Duggars: Why Children Should Never be Home-Schooled

Today during my break between classes I sat on the couch to watch a little television. I was flicking through the channels when I came to TLC and found that my favorite show, 17 Kids and Counting (I believe it’s called 18 Kids and Counting now, with #19 on the way) was on. Of course I had to stop here and see what they were up to, and to my surprise the Duggar family was visiting the Creationism Museum in Kentucky.

Jim Bob (the husband/father of the family, and yes, his name is Jim Bob) was being interviewed on why they were there. He said he wanted to teach his children about how the world was created, and show them that all this “evolution stuff” just isn’t true. They saw all the different parts of the museum such as the “Natural Selection is Not Evolution” exhibit where they were shown how “natural selection allows organisms to possess characteristics most favorable for a given environment—but it is not an example of evolution in the molecules-to-man sense”, the “Dinosaur Den” where humans and dinosaurs lived harmoniously on Earth together, the “Noah’s Ark Contruction Site” where millions of animals in “close quarters” were saved from the floods, and the “Walk Through Biblical History” where they could see the TRUE time line of the universe unfold.

After, some of the kids were asked about their thoughts on the subject. One of the girls said that scientific evidence suggests that the Earth is 6000 years old. I don’t think I need to even go further into that. Her brother said that a lot of things about evolution made sense to him, but once he read the Bible and its explanations he knew that evolution couldn’t be true because the Bible explains everything.

The show then went to a clip of Jim Bob in front of a large chart on the wall that shows humans in relation to other primates. The chart showed humans, fully developed, tall and slender as we are today, on one side with a line indicating 6000 years ago to today. The other side had a small tree of apes, all evolved from one common ancestor, with another line indicating 6000 years ago to today. Jim Bob said, “See kids! We aren’t evolved from apes!”

You may be wondering, like me, “How the hell can they possibly believe those things?!” Well, my friend, the lovely notion of home-schooling is why.

Extreme religion is just one example of why kids should NEVER be home-schooled. Home-schooling gives the parent complete control over what their child learns. Although there are laws (varying from state to state) regarding what subjects to teach and different standardized tests they need to take, in the state of Arkansas (where the Duggar family resides) there are no required subjects to be taught. No credentials are needed for the parents to teach, or any required amount of time they need to spend “learning”. The student does not even have to meet a minimum score on any standardized tests. All the state requires is the parents must alert the superintendant in writing that their child will be home-schooled, and show up for the testing.

Now, I for one would never in a million years want my mom or dad to be my teachers. Don’t get me wrong, I love my parents and they are both very smart in different ways, but they have little to no idea what is going on in an academic world. They know very little about history, science, math, sociology or any other subject that might be taught in school. Even if they do know the basics, there is no way that one person could supply all the information I need to be successful. Throughout my academic career I have had a lot of teachers; most people have had a lot of teachers. The reason for this is because everyone specializes in different things. Students need to have all these teachers so they can absorb all the new information that each one brings to the table. They need to listen to all the different opinions, deal with all the different teaching styles, discuss problems, theories, equations, but most importantly develop their critical thinking skills.

Although even public schools for the most part fail to really promote or expand critical thinking in students, simply being in an environment that promotes the spread of information as a whole lessens the severity of ignorance. Not to mention the laws regarding curriculum, teaching credentials, and testing help the situation as well. But with good ol’ home-schooling if I wanted to, I could spend all day teaching my child that fairies create everything. That fairies run the country, make decisions and magically make cookies appear.

That may sound silly, “But Angie, fairies aren’t real!” you say. Well, it’s not far from reality in a home-schooled setting. A parent can completely brain wash their child. They have the legal ability to keep their child isolated from not only their peers, but information. Vital information that is needed in order for the child to function at a healthy level in society. Vital information that may change their undoubted faith to “God,” and question their beliefs. And there is nothing keeping these parents from doing that.